Nice writeup! Though I think the phrase "priority to the worst off" can lead astray, or at least confuse between prioritarianism and some ideas in Rawls' difference principle and the adjacent idea of leximin. I think a better oneliner to catch the core of prioritarianism as "the lower someone's present wellbeing is the better it is to ma…
Nice writeup! Though I think the phrase "priority to the worst off" can lead astray, or at least confuse between prioritarianism and some ideas in Rawls' difference principle and the adjacent idea of leximin. I think a better oneliner to catch the core of prioritarianism as "the lower someone's present wellbeing is the better it is to make it go up one unit of wellbeing".
Worth mentioning also that some of the intuitions that prioritarians often draw on in discussions with utilitarians can also be appealed to by other alternative views. One could say that prioritarianism is only one among several options among the family of views called suffering focused ethics. Magnus Vinding's book is the best overview there https://magnusvinding.com/2020/05/31/suffering-focused-ethics-defense-and-implications/
Nice writeup! Though I think the phrase "priority to the worst off" can lead astray, or at least confuse between prioritarianism and some ideas in Rawls' difference principle and the adjacent idea of leximin. I think a better oneliner to catch the core of prioritarianism as "the lower someone's present wellbeing is the better it is to make it go up one unit of wellbeing".
Worth mentioning also that some of the intuitions that prioritarians often draw on in discussions with utilitarians can also be appealed to by other alternative views. One could say that prioritarianism is only one among several options among the family of views called suffering focused ethics. Magnus Vinding's book is the best overview there https://magnusvinding.com/2020/05/31/suffering-focused-ethics-defense-and-implications/
Super useful comment, thanks.
I’ll definitely check out the Vindig book.