4 Comments
Feb 3, 2022Liked by Sam Atis

As a high-decoupler, I think it's only reasonable to extend the thought experiment to *taking* money and donating it to an effective charity. Also some transaction that involves complex numbers.

But seriously, when I think about these sorts of things I also factor in the pragmatic effect on propensity to donate anything. It's not exactly in the ethical realm that you're trying to write about, but I figure that (given that a donor's post-donation feelings will impact future donation amounts) trying to establish one right answer will leave a significant fraction of people feeling blocked from whichever option (tangible or abstract) would feel emotionally sustainable to them.

Expand full comment

I don't think the thought experiment caveat about beggars never spending money on alcohol or drugs is reasonable. Warm food and shelter are available for free, for rough sleepers in any city in the UK. Most beggars are doing so specifically to feed a drug habit, and 80-90% of beggars are not homeless to begin with.

Expand full comment